Po — THE INDIAN STAMP ACT, 1899 (2 of 1899)

75. Po [Board of Revenue Circular dated 11.5.93— ting new stamp vendors and issuing new li rd of Revenue Circular dated 11.5.93— appointing new stamp vendors and issuing new li consideration the joint effec p vendors and issuing new li consideration the joint effect of the two condition (average monthly income of the St eration the joint effect of the two condition (average monthly income of the Stamp vendor and number of persons who can be appointed each year-there are no specific instructions by Board of R S provided by the Board of Revenue income of the Stamp vendor and number of persons who can be appointed each year-there are no specific instructions by Board of Revenue that for a particular district, only three appointments are to be made-circular dated 11 each year-there are no specific instructions by Board of Revenue that for a particular district, only three appointments are to be made-circular dated 11.5.93 would mean to say that not more than three appointments shall be made in one Sub-Regist r district, only three appointments are to be made-circular dated 11.5.93 would mean to say that not more than three appointments shall be made in one Sub-Registar jurisdiction every year- when the Board of Revenue did not say that ap that not more than three appointments shall be made in one Sub-Registar jurisdiction every year- when the Board of Revenue did not say that appointments would be restricted to the district as a whole then any interpretation by the dep ry year- when the Board of Revenue did not say that appointments would be restricted to the district as a whole then any interpretation by the departmental authorities that the inhibition/restriction shall be applicable to the w ricted to the district as a whole then any interpretation by the departmental authorities that the inhibition/restriction shall be applicable to the whole of district, would not be proper. Ali Akbar v. State of Bihar 2002(2) PLUR 731. the inhibition/restriction shall be applicable to the would not be proper. Ali Akbar v. State of Bihar 2002(2) PLUR 731. Secti appointment of stamp vendors-while cences the authority has to take in nt of stamp vendors-while cences the authority has to take into S provided by the Board and number of persons the authority has to take into S provided by the Board of Revenue 419.]

Section 75