Section 5
A?
5 A?
5: ..Mbther td '- 15. The mo *d @a. %.guardian property of he
ij th ppy
marriage wj th
.+
No thi deemed to a Act, 1890. 6
"-
The Hindu
and Guardianship Act, 1956 (Central
f Sti5 (b) thfjdj p , (
- Act32 of 1956), hiss, by v!rtUe of Section 5 (b) thereof, an ovcr-rjdjng
fft hlifiilbfh* ), , y () , jj
effect pver any other law in force imme,tiately befare the wmmon*
t f tht At ifiii itt ith f *h py ,y
,meat of that Act in so far as it is i no~nriste~t with any of *he provie
itid itht t sions oontained in that ~ct.
i
-. --...
---A
:+'iz
\
l,*-
$!t-h~-
. *? 2:-i44i;x.
‘
t-h~-
*.
2:
,‘-
_
$
:,*
zr-=-*----:
*-
,!. h.
-- --
I-
_
__
---
__
--- --
I '. -
a
-.I
lCHAPTER IV.
intestate Success;on.
-- --
A Person is deepled to die intustate in respect of all
d
P
j p
has not made a p
P~plty as to testamentary djsposi- which a ble of taking effect. -
--- --
persan is
dd p
deemed to die intestate.
On the death intestate of an Aiiyzsaddna male, his Davolut of of which is self-acquired or separate, shall devolve propany left by
(1) Where the intestate has ltft surviving hi;,. any Dev,: Jion line a1 descendant or descendants and also his A ,,A 7ther or a where intestate widow or widows or both his mother and a widow or has left lineal widows, the whole of the property shall devolve on them. descendant.
In the absence of the mother and any widow, the
The distribution of the property among the heirs Rules of distri-
(i) The widow, or if there is more than one widow, ()
each of the widows, shall be-entitled to a share equal to
(ii) The mother shall be entitled to a share equal to that of a child.
child (son or daugntcr) shall be entitled
(6 Where the child had predeceased the intestate, the lineal descendants of such child shlll, subject to the provisions of clause (vi), be entitled to the share which
thhild !d hhd hhid th p(),
the child ncu!d hp,q +qt-n, had he or she survived the
(iv) (a) G-rand children of the intestate by a deceased
hll btitld il btht thdd () () y
d shall be entitled in equal sbares to what the deceased d would have taken, had he or 'she sutvived the
&-i ~he Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Central Act .30 of 19561, has,
itf ti4 (b) thfidifft t h , (, , by virtue of section 4 (b) thereof, an over-riding effect over any at her
lifiditlbfth6t f tht At i y () , g y
law in form immediately before the camm6ncement of that Act in
fiiiiifiif A y
so far asit isinconsistent with any ofthe provisions of that Act.
.)
a
- 7,
'd
. .
'*.