Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii) — THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

vlk/kj.k EXTRAORDINARY Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi&[k.M (ii) PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii) izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ubZ fnYyh] c`gLifrokj] ] tqykbZ 24] 2014@Jko.k 2] 1936 la- 1526] No. 1526] NEW DELHI, THURSDAY, JULY 24, 2014/SHRAVANA 2, 1936 -- - -, 24 , 2014 . . 1894(.) --- , 2013 (2013 18) (- ) 29 , 2013 1 ! !"#$%&; 2 (76), - " '(' )" * +, - *! &, 12 , 2013 #$%&. (iv) '' /0*1 2 , 3 /0* 45"'6(76) "'67(i), (ii), (iii) (v) 8 & , "'6 #59 +: ' &* ; , +2 : +, - '- <25 #59&. :, ( =>! , , 2013 (2013 18) 470 - (1) ? *%/7 @ 45 +: 7 *< A , B 5 :- 1 . - - – (1) 8*/ ') ' !( +: 7 *< ) , 2014 8*/ - 2996 GI/2014 (1) 2. 2 -: , 2013 2 (76) (iv) , /0* "(' " D9 , " " /0*' :B E @- @': [. . 2/14/2014--V] *! F, +G , '49# # MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS ORDER New Delhi, the 24th July, 2014 S.O. 1894 (E).—Whereas the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) received the assent of the President on 29th August, 2013 and section 1 thereof came into force on the same date; And whereas clause (76) of section 2 of the Act, which provides for definition of the term"related party" has come into force on 12th September, 2013; And whereas difficulties have arisen in interpreting the said clause due to the absence of the word "relative" in sub-clause (iv), although such word has occurred in sub-clauses (i), (ii), (iii) and (v) of the aforesaid clause (76) resulting in a disha