Section 54r

/w oroviso 2i . 2 of Modified Building 8y8 tawsmulti-storeyed apartment constructed after rnal<ing major deviation from the sanction . plan-ag2ii1ist sanction to build upto the height of 6 floors . construction were made upto the height of nine floorsthe provisions made in the bye laws either about . !'luor area ratio or thA area and height limitations are not without significance -11'",ar;c provisions have been made after taking into consideration various factors rn~e density of population . state of availability of inlrastn .cture and also potential for development!he front set back available instantb is sufficient only for a ou!idin!J of heighl of 21.0 mt. while the construction 01 ihe building had been made more than 31 mt. tor which front set back wc:..s inadequate -the devia'.ion2/ shortfalls cannot be met oy acquiring adjacent land since the front and set -backs, of lhe building would not change oven on obtaininq land to rear of the buildin9 in question -impugned order for depositing condonation/ compounding iee and also to remove deviations I meet shortfalls upheld Mis Seket I-lousing Uc'. vs . Patna , qogional Dev Authonty, ~ 003(L!) PLJH , 832

Back to Act Act Subordinates

Section 54 r/w oroviso 2i . 2 of Modified Building 8y8 tawsmulti-storeyed apartment constructed after rnal<ing major deviation from the sanction . plan-ag2ii1ist sanction to build upto the height of 6 floors . construction were made upto the height of nine floorsthe provisions made in the bye laws either about . !'luor area ratio or thA area and height limitations are not without significance -11'",ar;c provisions have been made after taking into consideration various factors rn~e density of population . state of availability of inlrastn .cture and also potential for development!he front set back available instantb is sufficient only for a ou!idin!J of heighl of 21.0 mt. while the construction 01 ihe building had been made more than 31 mt. tor which front set back wc:..s inadequate -the devia'.ion2/ shortfalls cannot be met oy acquiring adjacent land since the front and set -backs, of lhe building would not change oven on obtaininq land to rear of the buildin9 in question -impugned order for depositing condonation/ compounding iee and also to remove deviations I meet shortfalls upheld Mis Seket I-lousing Uc'. vs . Patna , qogional Dev Authonty, ~ 003(L!) PLJH , 832